Rick Perr focuses his practice in complex commercial litigation and professional liability defense. He is a nationally recognized authority and lecturer on creditor’s rights, representing creditors, law firms and agencies against individual and class action allegations invoking federal and state consumer protection laws, including the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
Mr. Perr also advises entities and individuals on matters related to compliance in the credit and collection industry, including review, implementation and auditing of policies and procedures, especially in adherence with governmental regulatory bodies such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).
He has served as a foreign policy intern for then United States Senator Al Gore (D-TN) and was the Chairman of the Burlington County Democratic Party. Mr. Perr also served as an Adjunct Professor of Law at Rutgers – Camden School of Law, teaching Election and Political Campaign Law, and has appeared in numerous national, regional and local publications and on broadcast media on the issues of politics and election law. He was also a contributing author for the twenty-volume encyclopedia Constitutions of the Countries of the World.
- New Jersey
- New York
- U.S. District Court
– Eastern District of Pennsylvania
– Middle District of Pennsylvania
– Western District of Pennsylvania
– District of New Jersey
– Eastern District of New York
– Southern District of New York
- U.S. Court of Appeals
– Second Circuit
– Third Circuit
– Seventh Circuit
– Eleventh Circuit
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Rutgers-Camden School of Law – J.D., International and Foreign Law with Honors
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey – B.A., Political Science, History and English
- Association of Credit and Collection Professionals (ACA)
Federal Affairs Committee Chair, 2015-2016
Regulatory Committee Chair, 2014-2015
Audit Committee Chair, 2013-2014
Board of Directors, 2012-Present
Members’ Attorney Program (MAP)
MAP Committee, 2011-2014, Chair, 2012-2013
State Compliance Chair, Pennsylvania, 2005-2007
State Compliance Chair, New Jersey, 2011-2013
Fellow Designation, 2013
Members’ Attorney Program Designation, 2013
- Professional Liability Defense Federation
Miscellaneous Professional Liability & Cyber Claims Committee, Chair 2018-Present
- Mid-Atlantic Collectors Association – Board of Directors, 2011-Present
- Burlington County Bar Association
Federal Practice Committee, Chair, 2005-2006
Government Relations Committee, Co-Chair, 2009-2010
- Burlington County Democratic Party, Chair, 2006-2009
- The Legal Intelligencer and the Pennsylvania Law Weekly Lawyers on the Fast Track, Class of 2008
- New Jersey State Bar Association
Election Law Committee, Chair, 2003-2005
Federal Practice Committee, 2012-2013
- New Jersey Superlawyers, Business Litigation, 2006–2011
- New Jersey Supreme Court Ethics Committee – District IV, 2005-2009
- Philadelphia Bar Association
- Boy Scouts of America – Cubmaster, Garden State Council, Pack 300, 2004-2005
- March of Dimes South Jersey Division, Board of Directors, 2010-2012
- March for Babies Executive Steering Committee, Chair, 2008-2010
- Rutgers School of Law – Camden
Adjunct Professor of Law – Election and Political Campaign Law
- Media Appearances:WPVI-TV (Channel 6 – Philadelphia), CN8 (Comcast News Network – Philadelphia), NJN (New Jersey Network – Trenton), National Public Radio, Associated Press, Chicago Tribune, Newark Star Ledger, New York Times, Philadelphia Inquirer
- Szczurek v. Prof’l Mgmt., No. 14-4775, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 17245 (3d Cir. September 10, 2015) (In an FDCPA action, debt collector was entitled to judgment on the pleadings under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c), because court disagreed with debtor’s interpretation of a sentence in a debt collection letter as misleading and declined to hold debt collector liable for failing to notify consumers of rights above and beyond what was required by the FDCPA).
- Douglass v. Convergent Outsourcing, No. 13-3588, 765 F.3d 299 (3d Cir. 2014) (The district court erred in granting the debt collector summary judgment on the debtor’s 15 U.S.C. § 1692f(8) claim where the disclosure of the account number implicated a core concern of the FDCPA, i.e., invasion of privacy, and thus, its disclosure was not benign).
- Seamans v. Temple Univ., No. 12-4298, 744 F.3d 853 (3d Cir. 2013) (In this FCRA action, the grant of summary judgment to the university was vacated; once the borrower’s loan had been repaid, the trade line pertaining to the Loan should have “aged off” his credit report pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a)(4), because the Loan by that time had been placed for collection more than seven years prior).
- Caprio v. Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLC, No. 12-1846, 709 F.3d 142 (3d Cir. 2013) (Based on the court’s interpretation of a collection letter from the perspective of the applicable “least sophisticated debtor,” it determined that the substance and the form of the letter overshadowed and contradicted the validation notice, contrary to 15 U.S.C. § 1692g. It was deceptive because it could be read to have two or more meanings).
- Lesher v. Law Offices of Mitchell N. Kay, PC, No. 10-3194, 650 F.3d 993 (3d Cir. 2011), cert. denied, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 967 (Jan. 23, 2012) (Two debt collection letters from a law firm, acting as a debt collector, were deceptive in violation of the FDCPA because they falsely implied that an attorney was involved in collecting the debt, and the least sophisticated debtor would reasonably believe that an attorney had reviewed the file and determined that legal action was appropriate).
- Rosenau v. Unifund Corp., No. 07-3019, 539 F.3d 218 (3d Cir. 2008) (Judgment on the pleadings was improperly entered for debt collector as to consumer’s deceptive practices claims under 15 U.S.C. § 1692e(3), (10). Factual dispute existed as to whether least sophisticated consumer would think that collection letter signed “Legal Department” necessarily meant that attorney was involved in writing or sending letter).
- Orson, Inc. v. Miramax Film Corp., No. 97-1994, 189 F.3d 377 (3d Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 1869 (March 6, 2000) (State statute banning exclusivity in motion picture distribution after 42 days was preempted by Copyright Act; state cannot control distribution of copyrighted work contrary to statutory exclusive distribution rights).
- Counseled client through the purchase of a debt portfolio with a face value of $2.4 billion. Fast-paced transaction with an end-of-the-year deadline.
- Successfully forced plaintiff’s counsel to resolve a substantial class action on an individual basis, which dramatically lowered the exposure to the client. Because the nature of the case changed from a class action to a single plaintiff lawsuit the client was only required to pay a nominal settlement.
- Obtained summary judgment on behalf of a leasing company sued as a result of a multiple fatality motor vehicle accident. Plaintiffs alleged that the leasing company’s failure to maintain its own insurance policy on the vehicle made it responsible under a state statute requiring such companies to have insurance to pay for the damages caused by the driver of the vehicle. The court agreed with the leasing company and ruled that noncompliance with the statute did not create a private right of action by the Plaintiffs.
- Selected for inclusion on the 2006 – 2011 New Jersey Super Lawyers® lists.
- Selected for inclusion on the 2008 “Lawyers on the Fast Track” list by The Legal Intelligencer and the Pennsylvania Law Weekly
- US Supreme Court Justices Seem Inclined to Preserve Consumer Bureau, Legal Intelligencer
- KDV Alert – Nationwide COVID-19 Update For Consumer Financial Services
- KDV Alert: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Announces New Policy Regarding Abusive Acts
- KDV Alert: U.S. Supreme Court to Weigh In on 2015 TCPA Carve-Out for Government-Backed Debt Collection
- Judge Grants MSJ For Defendant in FDCPA Case Over Disputed Debt, AccountsRecovery.net, ft. Richard Perr
- Fourth Circuit Holds Multiple Prerecorded Calls to Obtain Location Information Do Not Violate the FDCPA, Mid-Atlantic Collectors Association Collectors Connection Newsletter, January 2013
- Five Simple Steps to Reduce Lawsuits , July 2010
- Much Ado Over Generic Concept of God, New Jersey Law Journal, October 3, 2005
- Primary Concerns, New Jersey Law Journal, August 26, 2005
- The Federal Credit and Collection Law Handbook
- Analyzing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (“CFPB”) Proposed Time-Barred Debt Disclosure Rule Webinar, AcountsRecovery.net : Analyzing the CFPB's Proposed Time-Barred Debt Disclosure Rule
- “What to Expect on the Compliance Horizon,” Northeast Debt Collection Conference, Groton, Connecticut, October 1-3, 2015
- “Beware of What You Mail: Letter Issues for Collectors in 2015,” Northeast Debt Collection Conference, Groton, Connecticut, October 1-3, 2015
- “Perfecting Judgment and Seizing Assets,” Rossdale CLE, delivered nationally via Teleconference, August 26, 2015
- “The TCPA and Technology Solutions,” NobelBiz Company, Boston, Massachusetts, July 19, 2015
- “Don’t Let Compliance Interfere with Productivity,” NobelBiz Company, delivered nationally via Teleconference and World Wide Web, April 23, 2015
- “Collection Law From Start to Finish,” National Business Institute, Cherry Hill, New Jersey, April 21, 2015
- “Burning Compliance Issues,” Northeast Debt Collection Conference, Atlantic City, New Jersey, October 5-7, 2014
- “FDCPA and Collecting the Judgment,” National Business Institute, Atlantic City and Cherry Hill, New Jersey, April 28-29, 2014
- “The CFPB and the TCPA,” NobelBiz Company, delivered nationally via Teleconference and World Wide Web, November 19, 2013